Man To Man vs Zone Coverage In Football

Man to Man and zone coverage are the two prevailing methods used to stop the opposing team from passing the football.

Man to man coverage relies on matching up defenders with receivers and having them follow them around the field throughout the play.

Zone coverage assigns portions of the field to each defender. Each defender is then responsible for stopping any passes from being completed in their area.

Both of these defensive coverage styles have advantages and disadvantages. Oftentimes teams will use a combination of man and zone coverage in order to stop the opposing team’s passing attack.

Pros And Cons Of Man Coverage

Pros

No Holes In The Coverage

One of the biggest benefits of man to man coverage is that there is not going to be any obvious holes. In order for the opposing team’s receivers to get open they are going to have to beat one of your defender’s man to man.

In zone coverage, there will be certain portions of the field in which the zones do not reach. This allows the offense to beat the defense without beating the players individually.

That being said methods such as pick plays can be used to strategically beat man coverage as well.

Choosing Your Matchups

Another benefit of man coverage is that you are able to pick your matchups. If you have an incredibly skilled corner you can put him in man coverage against the top receiver each play.

This is called shadowing and allows your top defensive players to focus in on the opposing teams top weapons. When playing zone defense you may find the offense will move receivers into zones with weaker defensive players.

This allows the defense to take advantage of the matchup.

Cons

Getting Beat Over The Top

Playing man on man coverage can sometimes leave a defense more susceptible to plays over the top. when covering one on one receivers have a much better chance at beating a defender on a deep pass.

This can allow for some big plays to happen from the offense. Zone defenses typically have players in a deep zone waiting to stop these sorts of throws.

Pros And Cons Of Zone Coverage

You Don’t Need To Match Their Talent

One of the biggest positive of zone coverage is that you do not need your players to match the talent level of the opposing wide receivers.

When playing man coverage you are going to need your cornerbacks to keep up with the opposing team’s top receivers. When playing zone you can rely on the scheme of your zone to stop the opponents passing attack.

In a zone defense defenders will only have to run with receivers for short periods of time. If they are beat badly it is likely that another zone defender will pick up that receiver as he moves throughout the field.

This is especially helpful for when facing teams with an elite receiving core. Or if you are running a defense that has below average talent when it comes to pass coverage.

Confusing The Offense

Another benefit of the zone defense is that it can offer a lot more looks for the quarterback. When playing man coverage the quarterback is going to have an easy read on the defense.

This is because he knows each defender is going to follow his man throughout the play. A zone defense can offer many different looks which ultimately can confuse the quarterback.

By changing the location and personnel of your zone coverage you will make the quarterback’s job a lot harder. And ultimately you may be able to force a bad throw into an area covered by the zone defense.

Cons

Holes In The Defence

The biggest con of the zone defense is that it is always going to have holes somewhere on the field. If you are facing an elite quarterback he may be able to consistently find the holes in between zones in your defense.

If a quarterback is able to consistently find these holes then the zone defense will be unsuccessful. This is why you will often see experienced quarterbacks pick apart a zone defense at the NFL level.

Leave a Comment